Policing the Police – The Citizen Police Review Board

A packed City Coucil meeting on Tuesday, July 6th revealed a lot of emotions and opinions on a current issue facing our community: the ability of the Pittsburgh Citizen Police Review Board (CPRB) to regulate our police independently. If you are unfamiliar with the Citizen Police Review Board, it was created to provide an avenue to investigate citizen complaints about improper police conduct. The members are appointed by the City Council and Mayor, which has come into question by the public recently.

Pushed into the spotlight with the recent case of a CAPA student beaten up by the Pittsburgh police, the urgency for a trusted avenue to review the police has never been greater. The fifteen or more citizens that spoke to the council had several issues with how they saw the board being run. One of the major complaints that can be changed immediately is the independence and selection process of the newest members.

The testimonies and speeches given provided an effective mix of reasons and views surrounding the CPRB. Some view the government ties to the appointing of new members as an extreme interference in the ability for it to uphold the idea of its separation from the mayor and the council. Taking heed of what was said, the council spoke on the issue despite not being on the agenda for the meeting. Most agreed to slow down the process of nominations in order to be more thorough and allow for more independence.

Another important issue that will be explored more thoroughly through the CPRB is the idea that more needs to be done to allow justice to prevail, according to some speakers. They would like to see more protection for the community as well as a standardized amount of information allowed to the CPRB, rather than changing every time a report is started.

At the end, one man spoke about trusting the police. He added, “not all police are bad, so don’t treat all of us like we’re bad”. This speaks specifically to issues many of those felt hit close to home: the racial profiling that has led to many investigations through the CPRB due to police brutality. An emotional mother spoke on the same topic, explaining that her son, an African American in Wilkensburg, would have been forty-four this week had he not been killed by police.

The community wants to be able to trust the police and to pursue a method of investigation when they feel it isn’t trustworthy. A democratic system for appointing members to the CPRB would allow for an “accountable and visible” justice system in Pittsburgh, as a Minister who spoke explained. The more the system is able to continually check and balance itself, the more the people will feel their city is safe and protected. Overall, they are pushing for a more effective and reliable system. In the words of Martin Luther King, Jr., “The time is always right to do what’s right.”

1 Comment

  1. Great opportunity for community input on the CPRB. When the current controversy subsides I hope we can utilize this site for enhancing CPRB ‘s work.
    Monday, 7/19 at 1:30 city council is holding a public hearing on two legislative proposals to deal with the deficient appointment process for the CPRB members. It is prelude to a scheduled council vote (7/27) on the mayor’s nominees to replace incumbent Board members (the ones who filed a contempt motion against the chief of police for G20 documents).
    Please attend the hearing if at all possible. The proposed legislation can be found at council’s Legistar website, bills 2010-711 and 2010-712.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s